Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Why Walcha isn't that boring...

  1. #1

    Why Walcha isn't that boring...



    THEBach legend must be Helmut Walcha, the blind organist from Leipzig. I've said that many times and over and over again people says: He is quite boring and oldfashioned.




    But you can't get more clear and polyphonic Bach playing than with Walcha...


  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    246

    Re: Why Walcha isn't that boring...

    .

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    108

    Re: Why Walcha isn't that boring...

    "He is quite boring and oldfashioned."



    Name one person from that generation who isn't now considered
    old-fashioned. When he started out everyone was playing Bach like
    Straube or Schweitzer or Dupre. I think he can be boring
    sometimes and I don't like all the works played by him but he is still
    interesting today.


  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    246

    Re: Why Walcha isn't that boring...

    .

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    58

    Re: Why Walcha isn't that boring...



    Let's not forget Chapuis also!







    Karl Richter was pretty impressive too.







    MM








  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    246

    Re: Why Walcha isn't that boring...

    .

  7. #7
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    108

    Re: Why Walcha isn't that boring...

    But some people consider Richter old-fashioned even though he was much
    younger. I would consider Chapuis and Alain in the next
    generation, considering they are still alive and playing (at Least
    Alain is) and Walcha died in the '70's.



    Marchal is a good exception but unfortunately very few of his
    recordings are available today- I have a recording of him playing
    Bach's Toccata, Adagio & Fugue on a tiny organ way back in the
    30's. I've also heard Joseph Bonnet playing De Grigny, Marchand
    and Attaingnant in 1936 which still sounds pretty good by today's
    standards. I think they both used the same organ at the Salon
    Gouin.








  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    246

    Re: Why Walcha isn't that boring...

    .

  9. #9
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    108

    Re: Why Walcha isn't that boring...

    I've only come across two CDs, one is a 5 CD set from EMI called
    "Orgues et Organistes..." and one of private recordings. I think
    the Bach pieces are actually on both CDs. Even if there have been
    CDs released of Marchal, Walcha now has 20+ widely available (2 Bach
    sets) and the WTC and Goldberg Variations on harpsichord.



    Any of Marchal at St. Eustache? I heard he could work wonders with that acoustic.


  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    246

    Re: Why Walcha isn't that boring...

    .

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •