John Bittner
10-29-2003, 07:43 PM
Getting back to your 77. You had it for years? your are a true warrior, how did you keep it running? No body I knew could, and every one I knew sold theirs not long after the problems would start. <post>621</post>
I purchased my X-77 in 1969 and kept it running for 25 years before selling it to make room for my Allen TO. I really liked this instrument, but it's clear that Hammond was struggling in very basic ways in making the transition to solid state electronics. The organ wasn't wired properly, the circuit boards weren't adequately shielded, and the switches and connectors were of low quality.
These factors led to a high level hum, susceptability to radio station pickup, pops and crackles from power line noise, and all sorts intermittancies. I was able to deal with these as they cropped up due to my electronics background, but a few years before I sold it, I finally had enough, ripped it apart and properly rewired the whole thing. The improvement in sound was amazing.
Compared to the B-3 the X-77 was more refined sounding. Less key click and less crosstalk. The low end went all the way down the manuals without note foldback as did the treble. This combined with the extra drawbars enabled alot more tonal variation than the B-3.
There were other differences that likely contributed to the fact the X-77 failed to surplant the B-3 as Hammond had hoped, but the reliability aspect was certainly a contributing factor.
I purchased my X-77 in 1969 and kept it running for 25 years before selling it to make room for my Allen TO. I really liked this instrument, but it's clear that Hammond was struggling in very basic ways in making the transition to solid state electronics. The organ wasn't wired properly, the circuit boards weren't adequately shielded, and the switches and connectors were of low quality.
These factors led to a high level hum, susceptability to radio station pickup, pops and crackles from power line noise, and all sorts intermittancies. I was able to deal with these as they cropped up due to my electronics background, but a few years before I sold it, I finally had enough, ripped it apart and properly rewired the whole thing. The improvement in sound was amazing.
Compared to the B-3 the X-77 was more refined sounding. Less key click and less crosstalk. The low end went all the way down the manuals without note foldback as did the treble. This combined with the extra drawbars enabled alot more tonal variation than the B-3.
There were other differences that likely contributed to the fact the X-77 failed to surplant the B-3 as Hammond had hoped, but the reliability aspect was certainly a contributing factor.