The Communications Decency Act of 1996 gives certain rights to website and domain owners which absolve them of any wrong-doing that is caused by the users of their websites. (feel free to look this one up) -- in the interest of keeping information and advice flowing, I would suggest that the gurus on this website NOT censor their comments, as it contradicts what this site was originally designed to do: Provide a quorum for the mutual respect, discussion, and idea generation regarding the organ. I wouldn't necessarily wait for the owners of Organ Forum to post a disclaimer, because, well, honestly, they're already absolved!
But, say, for example, that you fear that your advice might catch you in an uncompromising situation. My suggestion would be to take a common sense approach. Are organs inherently more dangerous that any other electrical device? Of course not. The ultimate responsibility lies with the end-user who must either accept or reject the advice. Now, if you maliciously gave advice to someone about dropping a hairdryer in a bath-tub, that would be quite another scenario. In the end, you must decide for yourself if your advice is sound and reasonable, or is wanton, egregious, or malicious -- and I doubt that any of you have those thoughts in mind. I wouldn't worry.
However, if you are still concerned, simply state - "But do so at your own risk." --- but is that really necessary? Doubtful.
Personally, I'd worry more about hitting someone with my car than giving advice on an organ forum. Fair?
Best,
Matthew
P.S. Am I a lawyer? No. But I did stay in a Holiday Inn Express last night. 